15
Sep

On the Right Side: Taxes OK if they are used well

   Scris de: Radu Cristea   in Talmeş-balmeş

Articol publicat in The Daily Star

I’m not upset for paying taxes. I don’t have a problem that taxation is so high for small businesses _ even though small- and medium-sized companies are the engine that moves the economy forward.

I mean, after all, we do need strong national revenue. If a company is taxed, it pays a part of its income or profits to the government so the government can pay for public services such as education, health care, military and police.

Paying all these taxes would not bother me at all if the money would go to the right places, where it’s needed the most. However, finding out about overpriced acquisitions for government contracts delivered to certain politicians through companies owned by their wives, sons or relatives deeply disturbs me.

Seeing the poor quality of the centralized health care system and the low remuneration that doctors get deeply disturbs me. I see the government wasting money every day like crazy, and this drives me nuts.

Now, as I said, the government collects taxes and then distributes the funds to all public services, including health care. The Romanian health care system has been in existence since 1700, and it has had many an unsung hero since. During the 1828 plague in Bucharest, 21 out of 26 doctors died of plague whilst administering treatment for the disease.

Today, I can frankly say that the health care system is ill, very ill, and will probably die soon unless urgent measures are taken. Despite the high taxation, health care is dangerously underfunded, which causes problems.

Hospitals owe money to medical suppliers and make partial payments to laboratories so they can survive. The Romanian Association of Medical Product Suppliers even threatens to cut deliveries to several hospitals in the country. Despite the suppliers’ sympathy for the problems of the Romanian health system, they are ready to turn off the switch.

On a personal level, even though I’m entitled, as a taxpayer, to free medical care, I would still have my wife give birth in a private clinic and gladly pay for that. It’s not that the doctors in the state’s health care system aren’t great professionals. It is just that health care is generally poor by European standards.

Underpaid doctors have the tendency to either accept or even request certain financial benefits from their patients. For example, my friend who is eight-months pregnant has already made an appointment to give birth at a private clinic, but not before checking out a regular, government-funded hospital.

She found that in the state hospital she would need to bring a lot of things _ including aspirin and a piece of cloth that doctors would use to wipe the baby right after birth.

Besides this and the poor look of the hospital, she also found out that she should grease the squeaky wheels of the system by giving 500 Euros to the doctor and another 200 or so to the nurses that would deliver her child into the world.

Why this bribe? So they can take better care of her and the baby.

Now, on the other hand, the fee at the private clinic she is going to is 1,000 Euros. The clinic looks much nicer and has better equipment. The staff is great, and all she needs to bring are just clothes for the newborn baby. She will be paying the private clinic’s fee because it’s the better choice.

Could you imagine for a second how frustrating this is? I mean, you pay for medical care with your taxes all your life; but when you need to benefit from that money, you find out that you need to pull more money out of your pocket just to be treated normally.

Centralized health care doesn’t work. In a private health care system, you have choices you can make on your own money.

When you pay revenue to the government and it decides how the funds are distributed to health care, you have no control over your money. You can’t make decisions on how that money is being spent.

Despite my belief that everyone should have access to health care, I do believe that private, independent health care is the best.

Share this:
Share this page via Email Share this page via Stumble Upon Share this page via Digg this Share this page via Facebook Share this page via Twitter
Articolul a fost scris on Tuesday, September 15th, 2009 at 04:11 si este arhivat in Talmeş-balmeş. Puteti urmai raspunsurile prin RSS 2.0 feed. Puteti raspunde, sau trackback catre site-ul dvs..

3 comments so far

John Dean
 1 

A comparison between the Romanian health care system and the United States sums up the logic of this article. A private healthcare system in Romania would not exist for most citizens. In any event the choices are hardly between this described Romanian process and the fears of right wing fanatics who clearly have no grasp of the situation.

September 15th, 2009 at 04:15
Daniel Popa
 2 

Over the last three years, Romania has seen a substantial change in the way its health-care sector is financed, namely, a shift towards the funding of health-care by means of an insurance system. The introduction of health insurance increased the amount of public funding available for that sector. Yet despite this positive development in terms of revenue, at least half the users of the health services report making additional out-of-pocket payments. This healthcare worked just fine until 1945 when the communists came in socialized the healthcare. A private system is better.

September 15th, 2009 at 04:16
Tim
 3 

I am in complete agreement with Mr. Dean’s comment. Mr. Sears is trying to compare apples to oranges in his example. As an accountant, he should know better. Even at the supposed rate of 1000 Euros (which Romania doesn’t officially use, so the rate is much higher), childbirth would cost slightly more in dollars. In the US, the cost of giving birth, with insurance, according to some research, is between 5 and 6 thousand. The fundamental point here is why does everything cost so much more here in America with all of our technology and wealth if the care in Romania at a private hospital is so great? I agree with the statement that taxes should be used judicially and appropriately, but the waste is usually from graft and over-spending and poor accountability (see private contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan).

September 15th, 2009 at 04:16

Poftiti de comentati

Nume (*)
Mail (musai, oricum nu se publica) (*)
Website (daca aveti)
Textul dvs.
*